Evidence Hub

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate the Antibacterial Treatment Effect of Nitrofurantoin for a Non-Inferiority Trial in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection

Fanny S. Mitrani-Gold, A. Raychaudhuri, Sapna Rao

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2020

9 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Active-comparator, non-inferiority study designs are used in uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) to establish the efficacy of a new antibacterial, given the availability of effective antibiotics. We estimate the treatment effect of a planned antimicrobial comparator (nitrofurantoin), from historical trial data, to properly design an upcoming non-inferiority study in uUTI.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines which incorporate recommendations for standardized data quality assessment, reporting of results, risk of bias assessment and sensitivity analyses. To account for inter-study variability, a weighted non-iterative, random effects model was fit, using R software to obtain estimates of the microbiological response rate and corresponding 95% CI for nitrofurantoin and placebo treatment. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed, with Cochran's chi-square test for inter-study heterogeneity; I2 statistic and P values were computed and included in the forest plot of the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve unique studies met the final eligibility criteria for meta-analysis inclusion; 3 trials assessed placebo efficacy, 8 trials assessed nitrofurantoin efficacy, and one study assessed both nitrofurantoin and placebo efficacy in uUTI. The overall microbiological response (95% confidence interval) was 0.766 (0.665, 0.867) for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free