Evidence Hub

Emergence of Escherichia coli ST131 Causing Urinary Tract Infection in Western Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alireza Jafari, S. Falahatkar, Kourosh Delpasand, Hoda Sabati, Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie

Microbial Drug Resistance, 2020

21 citations

Abstract

Escherichia coli sequence type (ST) 131 is considered a high-risk pandemic clone and frequently extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing clone that is strongly associated with the global dissemination of CTX-M-15 type. The emergence of ST131 has become a public health threat because this clonal group typically exhibits multiple virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the literature published on the estimation of the prevalence of clone ST131 among E. coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in western Asia. A systematic search was carried out to identify eligible articles in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases from January 2010 to December 2018. Next, 13 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The included studies were conducted in Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Yemen. In all studies, the pooled prevalence of ST131 was 24.6% (95% CI: 13.5%–40.4%) in wild type isolates, 42.7% (95% CI: 32.5%–53.5%) among ESBLs-producing isolates, and 64.8% (95% CI: 36%–85.5%) among multiple-drug resistant (MDR) isolates. Moreover, the prevalence of ST131 isolates carrying CTX-M-15 type was 68% (95% CI: 48.4%–82.8%). Our study indicated the high prevalence of broadly disseminated ST131 clone among MDR and ESBLs isolates in western Asia. Moreover, O25b was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free