Evidence Hub

Antibiotics for Preventing Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Philipp Jent, J. Berger, A. Kuhn, B. Trautner, A. Atkinson, J. Marschall

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022

35 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recurrent urinary tract infections are a common health problem. The only comprehensive synthesis on antibiotic prophylaxis in the last 15 years has been a guideline-embedded meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published up to October 13, 2020, evaluating patients age ≥12 years with either ≥2 episodes of lower urinary tract infection (UTI) within 6 months or ≥3 in the past year. Placebo or antibiotics were allowed as comparators. Study quality was low. In the 11 placebo-controlled trials, the risk for developing UTI was 85% lower with prophylaxis in comparison with placebo (risk ratio [RR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08–0.29). In the 9 head-to-head trials, the efficacy of the antibiotic agents appeared similar: The pooled RR indicated no difference between nitrofurantoin and comparators (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74–1.37), nor trimethoprim (+/- sulfamethoxazole; RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.89–2.03) or norfloxacin and comparators (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.43–1.70). Studies comparing intermittent (postcoital) with continuous strategies revealed intermittent application to be equally effective.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free