Evidence Hub

Accuracy of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests for diagnosing bacteriuria in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ana Moragas, Ramon Monfà, A. García-Sangenís, Carl Llor

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urine dipsticks are commonly used for the diagnosis of bacteriuria and/or urinary tract infections (UTIs).

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of positive leukocyte esterase and/or nitrite results from dipsticks (index test) for diagnosing bacteriuria in older individuals, using urine culture as the reference standard.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the inception date up to April 2025. We also searched the reference lists of all the studies identified.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Both prospective observational cohort and case-control diagnostic studies were included. No language restriction was applied.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 60 or more with or without symptoms of UTI in the community, nursing homes or hospitalised.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

We used the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool for assessing risk of bias.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of leukocyte esterase and/or nitrites for the detection of bacteriuria. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024561882.

RESULTS

Of 1,933 articles screened, 16 met inclusion criteria and had moderate risk of bias. Ten studies were hospital-based; six were in nursing homes. Pooled urine dipstick sensitivity and specificity for bacteriuria were 90% (95% CI, 84-94%), and 56%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free