Evidence Hub

Kluyvera ascorbata as a Pathogen in Adults and Children: Clinical Features and Antibiotic Susceptibilities in a Single Center Study

Lee J, Hwang JH, Jo DS, Lee HS, Hwang JH

Japanese journal of infectious diseases, 2019

24 participants

Abstract

To assess the clinical characteristics of the rare Kluyvera ascorbata infection, we reviewed the medical records of patients from whom K. ascorbata was isolated from 2010 to 2016, and conducted a systematic review of the English and Spanish literature in PubMed for reports of K. ascorbata infection in humans from 1971 to 2018. A total of 43 cases (24 adults and 19 children) were enrolled: 3 at our hospital and 40 from the literature review. The urinary tract was the most common site of infection (44.2%, 19/43), followed by the bloodstream (27.9%, 12/43). There was no significant difference in the frequency of urinary tract infections (50% vs 36.8%; P = 0.388) and bloodstream infections (25% vs 31.6%; P = 0.633) in adults and children. Seventeen (60.7%, present in 28 of 43 cases) had nosocomial or healthcare-associated infections: 72.7% among children and 60% among adults. Superinfection developed in 20% (6 in 30 cases). The overall mortality was 12.1%. The antimicrobial agents mainly used in these 43 cases were third-generation cephalosporin, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and carbapenem. Most strains were resistant to ampicillin and first- and second-generation cephalosporins. K. ascorbata is a rare but significant clinical pathogen in adults and children.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free