Evidence Hub

Clinical Characteristics, Microbiological Spectrum, Biomarkers, and Imaging Insights in Acute Pyelonephritis and Its Complicated Forms-A Systematic Review

Chițu MC, Salmen T, Răducanu PR, Pălimariu CM, Salmen BM, Stoian AP, Jinga V, Mischianu DLD

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Acute and obstructive pyelonephritis (AOP) management, despite advancements in diagnostic imaging and antimicrobial therapy, is characterized by delayed recognition and increasing antimicrobial resistance. This review aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the clinical characteristics, microbiological spectrum, biomarkers, and imaging findings associated with AOP. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251162736). Literature searches were performed across the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 2014 and 31 March 2025 using the term "acute obstructive pyelonephritis". Inclusion criteria comprised original full-text English-language studies, published in the last 10 years and conducted in adults, reporting clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and imaging characteristics. Exclusion criteria are letters to the editor, expert opinions, case reports, conference or meeting abstracts, reviews, and redundant publications; having unclear or incomplete data; and being performed on cell cultures or on mammals. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. AOP predominantly affected elderly patients with comorbidities, especially diabetes mellitus and urinary tract obstruction. Predictors of septic shock included thrombocytopenia,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free