Evidence Hub

Virulence and resistance factors of Nakaseomyces glabratus (formerly known as Candida glabrata) in Europe: A systematic review

Rodríguez-Cerdeira C, Pinto-Almazán R, Saunte DML, Hay R, Szepietowski JC, Moreno-Coutiño G, Skerlev M, Prohic A et al.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025

7,241 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Background: Nakaseomyces glabratus (N. glabratus) formerly known as Candida glabrata (C. glabrata), is an endogenous opportunistic pathogen, which is generally located in the gastrointestinal tract but can spread in immunocompromised patients. N. glabratus is the second most common pathogen that causes candidemia in several countries. N. glabratus virulence factors may increase antifungal resistance and reduce the number of available treatment options. High resistance to azoles and increasing resistance to echinocandins have been previously reported in N. glabratus.

Objective: To establish the distribution of N. glabratus isolates in Europe and its drug susceptibility/resistance in each country over the last 7 years.

Methods: The search was performed across three databases: PubMed, Scopus and Scielo, using the MeSH terms: "Candida glabrata", "Nakaseomyces glabratus", "Europe", "resistance" and "Epidemiology" exclusively in English. All available information from January 2002 to December 2022 was included, excluding reviews, meta-analyses and book chapters.

Results: Fifty-seven articles with information on antifungal susceptibility in Europe were retrieved and analysed with a total of 15,400 reported C. glabrata isolates. Remarkably, nations that presented the maximum number of cases during the study period included the United Kingdom (n = 7241, 47.02%), France (n = 3190, 20.71%), Spain (n = 900, 5.84%), Hungary (n = 745, 4.84%) and Italy (n = 486, 3.16%). C. glabrata…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,241 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free