Evidence Hub

Increased fluid intake for the prevention of urinary tract infection in adults and children in all settings: A systematic review

O. Fasugba, B. Mitchell, E. McInnes, Jane Koerner, Allen C. Cheng, Heilok Cheng, S. Middleton

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2019

19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-antibiotic interventions for urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention have been investigated as a strategy to reduce antibiotic prescribing for UTI and subsequent antibiotic resistance. Increased hydration is widely advocated for preventing UTI; however, evidence for its effectiveness is unknown.

AIM

To systematically review the published literature on the effectiveness of increased fluid intake as a preventive intervention for UTI in adults and children in any setting.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2019 to identify published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating the effectiveness of high (≥1.5 litres/24 hours) versus normal/low (<1.5 litres/24 hours) fluid intake for UTI prevention. The outcome was UTI incidence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Due to the small number of studies identified, meta- analysis was not possible. Hence a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

FINDINGS

Of the 2822 potentially relevant papers, two were eligible for inclusion: a RCT (individual randomization) and a cluster RCT. Both studies differed in regards to participants, setting, sample size, UTI definition and intervention. The RCT was assessed as having a low risk of bias while the cluster RCT had a high risk of bias. Only the RCT, which included healthy premenopausal women visiting primary care clinics, demonstrated statistical significance for the effect of high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free