Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce urinary tract infections and Escherichia coli bacteraemia for older adults across all care settings: a systematic review

L. Jones, J. Meyrick, J. Bath, O. Dunham, C. McNulty

Journal of Hospital Infection, 2019

24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Escherichia coli bacteraemia rates in the UK have risen; rates are highest among older adults. Previous urinary tract infections (UTIs) and catheterization are risk factors.

AIM

To examine effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce E. coli bacteraemia and/or symptomatic UTIs for older adults.

METHODS

Sixteen databases, grey literature, and reference lists were searched. Titles and/or abstracts were scanned and selected papers were read fully to confirm suitability. Quality was assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme guidelines and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network grading.

FINDINGS

Twenty-one studies were reviewed, and all lacked methodological quality. Six multi-faceted hospital interventions including education, with audit and feedback or reminders reduced UTIs but only three supplied statements of significance. One study reported decreasing catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) by 88% (F (1,20) = 7.25). Another study reported reductions in CAUTI from 11.17 to 10.53 during Phase I and by 0.39 during Phase II (χ2 = 254). A third study reported fewer UTIs per patient week (risk ratio = 0.39). Two hospital studies of online training and catheter insertion and care simulations decreased CAUTIs from 33 to 14 and from 10.40 to 0. Increasing nursing staff, community continence nurses, and catheter removal reminder stickers reduced infection. There were no studies examining prevention of E. coli bacteraemias.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free