Evidence Hub

Use of ciprofloxacin versus use of aminoglycosides for therapy of complicated urinary tract infection: prospective, randomized clinical and pharmacokinetic study

Fang GD, Brennen C, Wagener M, Swanson D, Hilf M, Zadecky L, DeVine J, Yu VL

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1991

73 citations

Abstract

The efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin was compared with that of parenteral aminoglycoside for therapy of complicated urinary tract infection in a prospective randomized trial. The setting was a chronic-care Veterans Administration facility in which long-term bladder catheterization and resistant bacteria were common. Sixty-five consecutive patients were stratified for presence and type of bladder catheter, the presence of Providencia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa organisms versus other urinary pathogens, and renal dysfunction. A pharmacokinetic study of ciprofloxacin concentrations in serum and urine was performed with selected patients. Urinary catheters were present in 94%. All patients were symptomatic, and 58.5% had fever. Ciprofloxacin, 500 mg every 12 h orally, was compared with parenteral aminoglycoside for 7 to 10 days. Clinical response, defined by resolution of symptoms and fever at 5 to 9 days posttherapy (short-term) and 28 to 30 days posttherapy (long-term), was essentially identical for both treatment groups. Bacteriologic response, defined by sterile urine cultures, showed that ciprofloxacin was significantly more efficacious (P = 0.0005) than aminoglycoside at 5 to 9 days posttherapy. However, by 28 to 30 days, the response rate was essentially identical. Emergence of resistance to the study antibiotic was seen in 62 and 70% of those who did not show a bacteriological response and were receiving ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides, respectively. Concentrations of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free