Evidence Hub

Ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis for urinary tract infection: prospective, randomized, cross-over, placebo controlled study in patients with spinal cord lesion

Biering-Sørensen F, Høiby N, Nordenbo A, Ravnborg M, Bruun B, Rahm V

The Journal of urology, 1994

21 participants · 48 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose long-term treatment with ciprofloxacin in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord lesions and neurogenic bladder dysfunction, a prospective, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled study was performed. The study period was 12 months long, including 6 months of treatment with 100 mg. ciprofloxacin at night and 6 months of placebo treatment. The study was completed by 18 men and 3 women, median age 38 years (range 19 to 73 years). Within the last 12 months before inclusion into the study, the patients had between 3 and 14 urinary tract infections (mean 5.8) treated with antimicrobial agents. The number of urinary tract infections treated with antimicrobial agents during 6 months of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was 5 and during the 6 months of placebo treatment it was 59 (p < 0.00005) [corrected]. Fecal specimens showed supercolonization with ciprofloxacin resistant bacteria (Acinetobacter calcoaceticus) in 1 instance. No severe side effects were observed. Ciprofloxacin at a dose of 100 mg. at night was efficacious in preventing urinary tract infections during 6 months in patients with spinal cord lesions and neurogenic bladder dysfunction. After the controlled study 10 of the 21 patients used ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis for up to 39 months with a marked reduction in the pre-study infection frequency. In 1 patient ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli was subsequently found in the feces.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free