Evidence Hub

Early Symptom Response in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Treated With Gepotidacin or Nitrofurantoin: Pooled Analysis From Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies

Sheets AJ, Dennison J, Pogue JM, Kaye KS, Perry C, Millns H, Díaz-Regañón J, Janmohamed S

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026

3,136 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) can cause distressing symptoms seriously impacting daily activities. Early symptom relief during treatment, though fundamental to patients, is often overlooked in clinical trials. Gepotidacin, a new antibacterial agent, was noninferior to the first-line treatment nitrofurantoin in two randomized controlled trials (EAGLE-2 [NCT04020341] and EAGLE-3 [NCT04187144]). The current analysis utilized pooled data from these two trials to evaluate symptom responses during and after treatment in participants with uUTI.

Methods: Participants were aged ≥12 years with at least two uUTI symptoms, urinary nitrite and/or pyuria, and no complicating factors. Participants were randomized 1:1 to oral gepotidacin (1500 mg) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg), both taken twice daily for 5 days. At baseline (Day 1), on-therapy (OT; Days 2-4), and test-of-cure (TOC; Days 10-13) visits, urinary symptoms were assessed (0-3; none-severe) from which a total score (0-12) was derived.

Results: Overall, 3136 participants were randomized (1572 gepotidacin, 1564 nitrofurantoin). Mean (median) baseline symptom scores for gepotidacin and nitrofurantoin arms were 7.1 (7.0) and 7.2 (7.0), respectively; at OT, this decreased to 3.6 (3.0) for both arms. At the OT visit, >80% of participants had clinical improvement/resolution. Among those with baseline symptoms affecting everyday activities (moderate or severe), 53.2% (728/1369) assigned gepotidacin and 53.6%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,136 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free