Evidence Hub

Microbiological findings, antibiotic resistance rates and prescription practices for older women with recurrent urinary tract infections: a descriptive study alongside a multinational randomized controlled trial (ImpresU)

Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, N. Grude, Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Ronny K. Gunnarsson, Anna Kowalczyk, M. Godycki-Cwirko, T. Platteel et al.

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 2026

281 participants

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To describe microbiological findings during asymptomatic and symptomatic phases in older women with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs), to evaluate whether antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli among methenamine hippurate users differ from untreated controls, and to explore prescription patterns of UTI antibiotics. Methods This was a descriptive study alongside a multinational randomized controlled trial (ImpresU). Women aged ≥70 years with rUTIs were recruited from general practice in Norway, Sweden, Poland and the Netherlands between December 2019 and June 2022. Participants were randomized to methenamine hippurate 1 g or placebo twice daily for 6 months, followed by a 6 month follow-up period. Urinary samples were collected at baseline (asymptomatic) and during acute UTIs. Results We included 281 women. A dominating uropathogen ≥105 cfu/mL was detected in 29% of the baseline urine samples. Of the 178 urinary cultures taken at acute UTIs, 163 (92%) had bacterial growth, of which a minority (10%) were reported as mixed flora. E. coli was most frequently detected both at baseline and in acute UTIs (present in any concentration in 32% versus 60% of urine samples), with highest resistance to amoxicillin (36% versus 43%), trimethoprim (16% versus 22%) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (12% versus 16%). ESBL-producing E. coli at baseline were rare (4.1%). Phylogenetic subgroup B2 was the most frequent E. coli phylotype at baseline (52%). No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 281 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free