Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial for 7 or 14 days for febrile urinary tract infection in men: a multicenter noninferiority double blind placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

M. Lafaurie, S. Chevret, J. Fontaine, P. Mongiat-Artus, V. de Lastours, L. Escaut, S. Jauréguiberry, L. Bernard et al.

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2023

282 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for urinary tract infections in men remains controversial.

METHODS

To compare 7 days to 14 days total antibiotic treatment for febrile urinary tract infections in men, this multicenter randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial enrolled 282 men from 27 centers in France. Men were eligible if they had a febrile urinary tract infection and urine culture showing a single uropathogen.Participants were treated with ofloxacin or third generation cephalosporin at day 1, then randomized at day 3-4 to either continue ofloxacin for 14 days total treatment, or for 7 days followed by placebo until day 14.The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as a negative urine culture, the absence of fever and of subsequent antibiotic treatment between the end of treatment and 6 weeks after day 1. Secondary endpoints included recurrent urinary tract infection within weeks 6 and 12 after day 1, rectal carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales and drug-related events.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty participants were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy for 7 (115 participants) or 14 days (125 participants). In the ITT analysis, treatment success occurred in 64 participants (55.7%) in the 7-day group and in 97 participants (77.6%) in the 14-day group (risk difference-21.9 (-33.3 to -10.1)), demonstrating inferiority. Adverse events during antibiotic therapy were reported in four participants…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 282 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free