Evidence Hub

Herbal treatment with Uva Ursi extract versus fosfomycin in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: A randomized controlled trial

I. Gágyor, E. Hummers, G. Schmiemann, T. Friede, Sebastian Pfeiffer, K. Afshar, J. Bleidorn

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2021

398 participants · 33 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We explored whether initial treatment with the herbal drug Uva ursi (UU) reduces antibiotic use in women with uncomplicated UTI without increasing symptom burden and complication frequency compared with antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 42 family practices in Germany. The participants were adult women with suspected uncomplicated UTIs receiving either UU 105 mg 3×2 tablets for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin 3 g single dose (control), and their respective placebos. Participants and investigators were blinded. The primary outcome included 1) antibiotic courses day 0-28 as superiority, and 2) symptom burden (sum of daily symptom scores) day 0-7, as non-inferiority outcome (margin 125%). Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03151603.

RESULTS

Overall, 398 patients were randomly allocated to groups receiving UU (n = 207) and fosfomycin (n = 191). The number of antibiotic courses was 63.6% lower (95% confidence interval (CI) 53.6%-71.4%; p<0∙0001) in the UU group than in the fosfomycin group. The ratio of total symptom burden in the UU group compared to control was 136.5% (95% CI 122.7-151.9), failing non-inferiority. Eight women developed pyelonephritis in the UU group compared to two in the fosfomycin group (Mean Difference 2.8 [95% CI 0.2-5.9; p 0.067]). Adverse events were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with uncomplicated UTIs, initial treatment with UU reduced antibiotic use but led to a higher symptom…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 398 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free