Evidence Hub

Probiotic Prophylaxis in Adult Women with Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Marcos Yauri-Idelfonso, Claudia Picón-Rafaelo, Pedro Rosales-Goñe, V. Pulido-Capurro, Jessica Acevedo-Flores, W. Gómez-Gonzales, Kovy Arteaga-Livias

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2026

616 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) in women represents a common clinical problem whose traditional management through continuous antibiotic prophylaxis contributes to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus strains, have emerged as a potentially effective non-antibiotic alternative by restoring the urogenital microbiota.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of probiotic prophylaxis, administered orally or intravaginally, in adult women with rUTI, compared to placebo or antibiotic prophylaxis, were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched up to December 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence with GRADE. Due to clinical heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (n=616) were included. Compared with placebo, probiotics were associated with a reduction in the recurrence of urinary tract infections and an increase in the time to first recurrence. The most precise effect estimate available was a relative risk of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.20-1.20) for intravaginal Lactobacillus crispatus, with a recurrence rate of 15% versus 27% in the placebo group. Intravaginal administration showed a consistent trend toward greater clinical benefit across all studies, associated with effective vaginal recolonization. No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 616 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free