Evidence Hub

Methenamine hippurate as prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections in older women - a triple-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial (ImpresU)

Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Ronny K. Gunnarsson, Anna Kowalczyk, M. Godycki-Cwirko, T. Platteel, W. Groen et al.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2025

289 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the preventive effect of the antiseptic methenamine hippurate on recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) in older women.

METHODS

Triple-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase IV trial with a six-month treatment period and a six-month follow-up. Women ≥ 70 years with rUTIs were recruited from general practice in Norway, Sweden, Poland, and The Netherlands. Recruitment started December 2019, with follow-up completed at the end of June 2023. Participants were randomised to methenamine hippurate 1g x 2 or placebo 1 tablet x 2 for six months. The primary outcome was number of antibiotic treatments for UTIs during the treatment period. Secondary outcomes included number of antibiotic treatments for UTIs during the follow-up period, UTI symptom severity and episode duration. Differences in complications were measured as safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 289 recruited women, 281 (97%) were included in the main analysis (140 in the methenamine hippurate group, 141 in the placebo group). During the treatment period, the methenamine hippurate group had a lower incidence of antibiotic treatments for UTIs than the placebo group, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.75 (95% CI 0.57-1.0, p= 0.049). In the follow-up period, the ratio was reversed: The methenamine hippurate group had a higher incidence of antibiotic treatments for UTIs than the placebo group, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.3, p<0.001). There were no important differences in UTI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 289 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free