Evidence Hub

Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1987). III. Secular changes in susceptibility

Kosakai N, Kumamoto Y, Hirose T, Tanaka N, Hikichi Y, Shigeta S, Shiraiwa Y, Yoshida H et al.

The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 1990

Abstract

Sensitivity spectra of major species of bacteria (namely Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) which were among the clinical isolates mentioned in the first and second reports to various antibacterial and antibiotic agents and time courses of the spectra are reported below. 1. E. coli was sensitive to cefmenoxime (CMX), latamoxef (LMOX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefzonam (CZON) and flomoxef (FMOX) which are third generation cephems, carumonam (CRMN) which is a monobactam, imipenem (IPM) which is a carbapenem, ofloxacin (OFLX) and ciprofloxacin (CPFX) which are new quinolones. Compared to the preceding 5-year period, sensitivities to most drugs have increased. 2. Klebsiella spp. were sensitive to CMX, CZON and FMOX which are third generation cephem antibiotics, CRMN which is a monobactam and gentamicin (GM) and arbekacin (HBK) which are aminoglycosides. Compared to the preceding 5-year period, the sensitivity on the whole has increased slightly. 3. Proteus spp. were sensitive to CMX, LMOX, CAZ and CZON which are third generation cephems, CRMN, a monobactam and OFLX and CPFX which are new quinolones. Compared to the preceding 5-year period, increased sensitivities, particularly to parenteral cephems, were found. 4. Citrobacter spp. were sensitive to CPFX which is a new quinolone antibiotic and CRMN, a monobactam. Compared to the preceding 5-year period, the sensitivity as a whole…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free