Evidence Hub

Cefdinir Versus Cephalexin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Mitzner TM, Eid KM, Hughson DM, Jameson AP, Dumkow LE

Open forum infectious diseases, 2025

200 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Due to its low bioavailability and poor urinary penetration, there are concerns that cefdinir is a suboptimal agent for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Limited available literature examining cefdinir's use for UTIs has not shown worse outcomes compared with other oral beta-lactams; however, these studies are limited by small sample size or lack of symptom assessment as a measure of clinical cure.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult female patients who received either cefdinir or cephalexin for 5-7 days for symptomatic uncomplicated UTI (uUTI). The primary objective was to compare treatment failure, defined as recurrent or continued urinary symptoms necessitating re-treatment within 30 days, between patients treated with oral cefdinir 300 mg twice daily (cefdinir group) and cephalexin 500 mg twice daily (cephalexin group) in the outpatient setting.

Results: Three hundred sixty-seven patients were included (cefdinir n = 167; cephalexin, n = 200). Patients treated with cefdinir experienced a significantly higher rate of treatment failure (23.4% vs 12.5%, P = .006), and cefdinir was independently associated with treatment failure (odds ratio: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.1-3.4]). Additionally, patients who experienced treatment failure with cefdinir had a higher incidence of cefazolin nonsusceptible pathogens (cefdinir 37.5% vs cephalexin 0%; P = .024) and ceftriaxone nonsusceptible pathogens (cefdinir 31.2% vs cephalexin 0%; P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free