Evidence Hub

Intestinal Microbiota Transplant Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (MAST) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial

Mullish BH, Innes AJ, Roberts LA, Anim-Burton S, Webber L, Johnson NA, Ghani R, Farshi P et al.

BMJ open, 2024

50 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Lower diversity of the gut microbiome prior to allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) correlates with reduced survival after the intervention. Most patients undergoing HCT for a haematological malignancy have previously received intensive chemotherapy, resulting in prolonged neutropenic episodes requiring broad-spectrum antibiotics; use of these has been linked to reduced microbiome diversity. Intestinal microbiota transplant (IMT) is a novel treatment approach that restores this diversity. We hypothesised that IMT performed prior to initiation of HCT conditioning restores microbiome diversity during the early stages of HCT, leading to decreased frequency of complications and improved outcomes of HCT.

Methods and analysis: 50 adult patients receiving allogeneic HCT will be recruited into this phase IIa trial and randomised 1:1 to receive capsulised IMT or matched placebo shortly prior to initiation of HCT conditioning and followed for up to 12 months. The primary outcome will be to assess the increase in alpha diversity between pre-IMT and that measured at ~42 days after IMT administration (day +28 of HCT), comparing the difference between patients receiving IMT compared with placebo. Secondary outcomes will include tolerability, the dynamics of gut microbiome diversity metrics and taxonomy over all time points assessed, as well as clinical outcomes (including burden of invasive infections, days of fever, admission to intensive care, development…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free