Evidence Hub

A narrative review of in vitro studies on the role of reactive oxygen species in aggravating high-grade serous ovarian cancer development

Jeongmin Lee, S. Yeo, Hye Ok Kim, Jae Min Lee, Manish Kumar Singh, Sung Soo Kim, T. Oh, Dong Choon Park

Frontiers in Oncology, 2026

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage because its early symptoms are nonspecific, and the prognosis remains poor due to frequent recurrence and the development of drug resistance even after standard treatment. This review includes 19 in vitro studies and seeks to mechanistically summarize how reactive oxygen species (ROS) reinforce the tumorigenic program from the early stages of ovarian carcinogenesis to tumor progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Collectively, the selected studies suggest that exposure to environmental toxicants can increase ROS levels in ovarian epithelial cells, accompanied by inflammatory responses and elevated DNA damage markers, thereby creating a carcinogenesis-priming environment. During the progression stage, hypoxia, hormones, growth factors, and lipid signaling repeatedly activate survival and growth pathways, such as those involving HIF-1α/VEGF, JAK/STAT3, and AKT/mTOR, through ROS-mediated mechanisms to promote tumor cell proliferation, anti-apoptotic activity, and angiogenesis. In addition, ROS are associated with alterations in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-related markers, remodeling of the extracellular matrix, and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases, which enhance the metastatic and invasive potential of tumor cells. In the therapeutic context, ROS have been suggested to contribute to platinum-based chemotherapy resistance through mechanisms including changes in mitochondrial dynamics, activation of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free