Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of urine biomarkers for urinary tract infection in older women: a case-control study

Manu P Bilsen, Maxim M. Treep, Margaretha J. Aantjes, E. van Andel, J. Stalenhoef, C. van Nieuwkoop, Eliane M. S. Leyten, N. Delfos et al.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2023

15 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common among older women. However, diagnosis is challenging due to frequent chronic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), cognitive impairment, and a high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Current urine diagnostics lack specificity, leading to unnecessary treatment and antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of twelve urine biomarkers for diagnosing UTI in older women.

METHODS

In this case-control study, cases were women ≥ 65 years with ≥ 2 new-onset LUTS, pyuria and one uropathogen ≥ 104 CFU/mL. Controls were asymptomatic and classified as ASB (one uropathogen ≥ 105 CFU/mL), negative culture or mixed flora. Urine biomarker concentrations were measured through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and ELISA. Diagnostic accuracy parameters of individual biomarkers and a biomarker model were derived from ROC curves.

RESULTS

We included 162 community-dwelling and institutionalised older women. Five urine inflammatory biomarkers demonstrated high discriminative ability (AUC ≥ 0.80): interleukin 6 (IL-6), azurocidin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2), and C-X-C motif chemokine 9 (CXCL-9). Azurocidin exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 75-93%) and specificity 89% (95% CI 82-94%) at 16.7 ng/mmol creatinine). A combined biomarker and pyuria model showed improved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free