Evidence Hub

Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Therapies and Clinical Outcomes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

Abramavičius S, Akramienė D, Tashfeen T, Abramavičienė D, Stankevičius E

Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogen associated with diverse healthcare-associated infections and increasing antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review evaluated antimicrobial treatment regimens, clinical outcomes, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations in P. aeruginosa infections. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and March 2026. Data on antimicrobial therapies, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and PK/PD parameters were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the NHLBI quality assessment tool. Narrative synthesis was performed for all eligible studies, and a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted for studies with standardized outcome data. Of the 982 records identified, 249 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 34 were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The evidence base was highly heterogeneous regarding study design, patient populations, infection types, and treatment regimens. Respiratory infections, particularly in cystic fibrosis patients, accounted for most studies. Quantitative synthesis showed no consistent superiority of any antimicrobial regimen (or combination of them), while treatment outcomes were influenced by infection characteristics, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and PK/PD factors. No universally superior antimicrobial regimen was identified for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free