Evidence Hub

Clinical Predictors and Pathogen Resistance Dynamics in Hospitalized Patients with Urinary Tract Infections: A 2025 Institutional Study

Laza R, Luput-Andrica IM, Marinescu AR, Cut TG, Herlo A, Saizu AE, Floruncut AC, Nicolescu N et al.

Microorganisms, 2026

318 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Gram-negative uropathogens represents a critical bottleneck in global clinical management. This study evaluated shifting resistance phenotypes and patient risk profiles to identify independent predictors of multidrug resistance (MDR). A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 318 patients, utilizing statistical modeling to evaluate the impact of demographics, prolonged hospitalization, and comorbidities on MDR. Findings revealed a significant longitudinal exacerbation of resistance since 2012. A majority of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains and nearly all Myroides and Providencia species exhibited high-level resistance to cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. While high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam remains a therapeutic alternative, its utility is increasingly constrained by escalating Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) for Klebsiella and Escherichia coli (E. coli). Statistical modeling identified advanced age as the primary independent driver, with MDR risk increasing linearly with every additional year of age. Furthermore, indwelling catheterization was strongly associated with resistant infections, while human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status emerged as a significant cofactor in the selection of highly resistant strains. These findings underscore the need for a critical recalibration of therapeutic frameworks, prioritizing precision-guided stewardship.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 318 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free