Evidence Hub

Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with tigecycline for MDR gram-negative infections: a retrospective cohort study

Alowais SA, Aldairem A, Bin Saleh K, Alsowaida YS, Alharbi MM, Wali HA, Almangour TA

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens pose a major therapeutic challenge, particularly in settings with limited antimicrobial options. Tigecycline is frequently used as salvage therapy. However, evidence regarding the optimal tigecycline regimen, whether used as monotherapy or in combination, remains uncertain. This study aimed to describe the characteristics, clinical, and microbiological outcomes of these cases.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of adult hospitalized patients treated with tigecycline for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, and ESBL- or Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Klebsiella pneumoniae. Patients were categorized into tigecycline monotherapy or combination therapy groups. The primary outcomes were clinical success and 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. A sensitivity analysis excluding bloodstream and urinary tract infections was performed due to pharmacokinetic limitations of tigecycline.

Results: Two hundred eighty were included; 116 (41.4%) received tigecycline monotherapy and 164 (58.6%) received combination therapy. Patients receiving combination therapy had higher illness severity and higher intensive care unit admissions. Overall clinical success was achieved in 53.2% of patients with a higher rate in the monotherapy group (64.7%, p = 0.001), and 30-day mortality was 26.1%. After…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free