Evidence Hub

The impact of inter-infection time on antimicrobial resistance profiles in women with multiple urinary tract infections over time

Honda T, Vazquez-Montes MDLA, Fanshawe TR, Stoesser N, Butler CC, Walker AS, Hayward G

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025

10 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) treatment in primary care is increasingly complicated by antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles are rarely available to prescribers at the point of prescription. Susceptibility profiles from previous urine culture results could inform prescribing, but little is known about associations between previous and current susceptibilities and the impact of time between infections (inter-infection time) on these associations.

Methods: We analysed routinely collected healthcare records of women ≥16 years in Oxfordshire, UK, who had two or more culture-positive urine specimens consistent with a UTI between 2013 and 2019. We used generalized additive logistic models to estimate associations between resistance to each of eight commonly prescribed antibiotics at first UTI and at second UTI, and their interaction with inter-infection time, adjusted for age and calendar year.

Results: In 10 216 women, significant associations were observed between AMR at first and second UTIs. For all antibiotics, these were largest for short inter-infection times. Pivmecillinam resistance at first UTI (OR: 41.70; 95% CI: 27.70-62.80), followed by fosfomycin (OR: 19.90; CI: 13.66-28.92) and ciprofloxacin resistance (OR: 19.65; 95% CI: 16.30-23.75), were strongly associated with resistance to the same antibiotic at the second UTI for inter-infection times ≤3 months. Lower magnitude associations were observed for other antibiotics.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free