Evidence Hub

Incidence and resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections in Switzerland: a nationwide surveillance study (2010-2022)

Renggli L, Burri A, Ehrhard S, Gasser M, Kronenberg A, Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance

Infection, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important microorganism in BSIs. The aim of this study was to analyze recent trends in the incidence and resistance rates of P. aeruginosa BSIs in Switzerland and its different linguistic regions.

Methods: This retrospective, nationwide observational study analyzed the incidence (using Poisson regression models) and antimicrobial resistance (using logistic regression models) of P. aeruginosa BSIs in Switzerland from 2010 to 2022.

Results: The annual incidence of P. aeruginosa BSIs in Switzerland increased from 5.5 BSIs per 100,000 inhabitants in 2010 to 7.6 BSIs per 100,000 inhabitants in 2022 (p < 0.001). The incidence was higher in the French-speaking region than in the German-speaking region. The resistance rates increased significantly for cefepime (2.4% in 2010, 8.8% in 2022; p < 0.001), ceftazidime (5.6% in 2010, 9.4% in 2022; p = 0.014), ciprofloxacin (3.3% in 2010, 6.5% in 2022; p = 0.014), and piperacillin-tazobactam (6.4% in 2010, 11.2% in 2022; p = 0.002). No significant trends were observed for carbapenem-, aminoglycoside-, or multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. A high incidence was observed in patients ≥ 80 years, whereas resistance rates were high in young patients.

Conclusion: The increase in the incidence of P. aeruginosa BSIs emphasizes the importance of monitoring resistant and susceptible P. aeruginosa BSIs. Compared to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free