Evidence Hub

Impact of Empirical and Definitive Antibiotics on Pediatric Febrile Urinary Tract Infection Caused by ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales

Lee J, Kim Y, Kim YJ, Han SB, Suh JS, Lee SY, Kim JH

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

175 participants

Abstract

Although the clinical impact of empirical antibiotic susceptibility on urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PEs) is limited, the role of definitive antibiotics remains unclear. This study evaluated therapeutic outcomes and recurrence in children with febrile UTI caused by ESBL-PE, focusing on pathogen susceptibility to empirical and definitive antibiotics. Medical records of 376 UTI episodes caused by ESBL-PE in children aged n = 144) and empirical-non-susceptible (n = 175) groups, and further categorized into four groups based on definitive antibiotic susceptibility and treatment duration. Clinical outcomes were comparable between empirical-susceptible and empirical-non-susceptible groups. Among the four definitive-therapy groups, early clinical response did not differ significantly; however, UTI recurrence showed an increasing trend from 1.0% in those receiving empirical and definitive antibiotics to which pathogens were susceptible for ≥7 days to 6.3% in those receiving empirical antibiotics to which pathogens were non-susceptible and not receiving antibiotics to which pathogens were susceptible ≥7 days (p = 0.045). Despite favorable early response to empirical non-susceptible antibiotics, switching to susceptible antibiotics and maintaining therapy for ≥7 days is recommended for children with ESBL-PE UTIs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 175 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free