Evidence Hub

Multicentric Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance to Generate Data-Driven Regional Antibiograms: A Laboratory-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Pakistan

Noreen N, Aslam A, Abbas M, Ghulam Mustafa A, Jamshed S, Gajdács M, Iqbal A, Syed W et al.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

485 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: The escalating burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to public health in Pakistan, with rates of high antibiotic consumption and limited standardized surveillance on AMR rates. Our study aimed to carry out a multicentric surveillance of AMR to generate regional antibiograms for Northern Punjab, Pakistan, to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy and stewardship efforts. Methods: A laboratory-based, retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted over a six-month period across three tertiary care hospitals. Socio-demographic, clinical, and microbiological data (including specimen type and antibiotic prescription rates) were collected from N = 485 patients with confirmed bacterial infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed based on Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS v.22.0. Results: In our study setting, Gram-positive bacteria were common causes (60.0%) of infections, with Staphylococcus aureus (12.2%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (10.3%) being the most relevant. Among Gram-negative bacteria (40.0%), Escherichia coli (14.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.8%) were shown to be important pathogens. Overall, 25.0% of S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), while ~30% of E. coli showed resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs). Enterobacterales species had highly variable susceptibility rates (40-70%) for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 485 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free