Evidence Hub

A comparison of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens to decrease the risk of post-procedure urinary tract infection after onabotulinum toxin A injection

Jennifer A. Bickhaus, M. Vaughan, T. Truong, Yi-Ju Li, N. Siddiqui

International Urogynecology Journal, 2020

111 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis To evaluate the risk of post-injection urinary tract infection (UTI) after onabotulinumtoxin A (BTX-A) treatment based on the timing of when antibiotic prophylaxis is started. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of 111 women with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder who underwent intradetrusor injection of BTX-A. Two cohorts were identified: (1) 67 women who started antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin 1 day prior to injection; (2) 44 women who received antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin after injection only. We assessed for post-injection UTI within 90 days after BTX-A. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results One hundred eleven women underwent BTX-A. In total, 30 (27%) had a UTI within 90 days; these included 15/67 (22%) of those who started antibiotics 1 day prior to injection and 15/44 (34%) of those receiving antibiotics after injection. While the unadjusted analysis showed no significant associations between timing of antibiotic administration and UTI (OR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.24, 1.30; p = 0.18), an adjusted analysis showed the pre-procedure antibiotic group had a significant reduction in post-procedure UTI after controlling for age, history of UTI, diabetes, and urinary retention requiring catheterization (OR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.73; p = 0.01). Conclusions Starting antibiotics 1 day prior to BTX-A injection decreases the odds of post-injection UTI compared with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 111 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free