Evidence Hub

Microorganisms and antibiotic susceptibilities isolated from urine cultures

Gul A, Gurbuz E

Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica, 2020

828 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most common cause of infection among all infectious diseases at hospitals. Antibiogram results are needed to maintain treatment in patients with suspected UTI. However, empirical antibiotic treatment is initiated in patients since it takes time to obtain the results of antibiograms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the urine culture and antibiogram results of patients who were admitted to our hospital with suspected UTI and compare the results with other studies.

METHODS: Urine cultures requested from the hospital information system database between January of 2018 and 2019 were analyzed. Microorganism-positive urine samples and antibiogram results were evaluated and included in the study.

RESULTS: Of the patients, 748 (61.8%) were female and 463 (38.2%) were male. The average age of all patients was 44.9 years. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated microorganisms from urine cultures (n = 828, 68.4%). Among all microorganism-positive urine samples, antibiotic resistance against Cefalexin, Fusidic acid, Ampicillin, Erythromycin, Levofloxacin, Cefuroxime Axetil, Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole, Ceftriaxone and Ciprofloxacin was 83.9%, 68.4%, 61.8%, 44.7%, 42.7%, 36.4%, 30%, 28.6% and 26.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: High resistance to Cefalexin, Ampicillin, Cefuroxime, Axetil, Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole, Ceftriaxone and Ciprofloxacin, which are often preferred in empirical antibiotic selection, has…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 828 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free