Evidence Hub

Comparison of acute lobar nephronia and uncomplicated urinary tract infection in children

Yang CC, Shao PL, Lu CY, Tsau YK, Tsai IJ, Lee PI, Chang LY, Huang LM

Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi, 2010

265 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This aim of this study was to assess the clinical manifestations, the microorganisms involved and their antibiotic resistance in children hospitalized due to acute lobar nephronia (ALN) and non-ALN community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs).

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 265 previously healthy children hospitalized due to a first-episode of community-acquired febrile UTI between July 2004 and June 2007. Based on the results of renal ultrasonography and computed tomography, they were divided into ALN and non-ALN groups. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, distribution of microorganisms, and their antimicrobial resistance were analyzed.

RESULTS: Of the total number of cases of children admitted with a first-episode community-acquired UTI, 19.2% (n=51) were diagnosed as ALN. Children with ALN were older (1.86 years vs. 0.81 years; p < 0.01), had longer periods of fever before admission (4.7 days vs. 1.4 days; p < 0.01), higher peak body temperatures (39.5°C vs. 38.9°C; p < 0.01), higher white cell counts (18.86 × 10(9)/L vs. 15.08 × 10(9)/L; p < 0.01) and higher C-reactive protein levels (9.0 mg/dL vs. 3.5 mg/dL; p < 0.01) compared with non-ALN children. Fever also persisted for longer after the start of antibiotic treatment in the ALN children (2.7 days vs. 1.4 days: p < 0.01) and they required longer hospital stays and incurred higher medical costs. The major pathogen found in ALN was E. coli (90%). The E. coli…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 265 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free