Evidence Hub

Clinical significance and spread of fluoroquinolone resistant uropathogens in hospitalised urological patients

Naber KG, Witte W, Bauernfeind A, Wiedemann B, Wagenlehner F, Klare I, Heisig P

Infection, 1994

441 participants

Abstract

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ciprofloxacin were determined for 441 uropathogens from patients with complicated and/or hospital acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). None of the Enterobacteriaceae was resistant (MIC > or = 4 mg/l), but 21.7% of enterococci, 28.3% of Pseudomonas spp. and 38.5% of staphylococci were. Subtyping of the strains revealed that with staphylococci there was no clonal spread of resistant strains. In the case of enterococci and Pseudomonas spp., however, cross infections played a major role (46% and 40% respectively). In a retrospective analysis of 370 UTI episodes caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (74), enterococci (185) or staphylococci (111) there was no difference between sensitive and resistant strains with respect to clinical aspects and rates of elimination by appropriate anti-bacterial therapy. The rates of spontaneous disappearance without antibacterial therapy ranged from 28% in the case of P. aeruginosa up to 63% in the case of coagulase-negative staphylococci. This implies that especially in UTI caused by gram-positive cocci an indication for antibacterial therapy should be weighted thoroughly and fluoroquinolones should only be used in accordance with sensitivity testing.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 441 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free