Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance trends of Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates: a population-based study, 1998-2007

Al-Hasan MN, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Baddour LM

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009

461 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been contradictory results regarding temporal changes in the antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from tertiary care centres. Therefore, we performed a population-based investigation to examine in vitro antimicrobial resistance trends of E. coli bloodstream isolates.

METHODS: In this retrospective population-based incidence study, we identified 461 unique patients with first episodes of E. coli bloodstream infection (BSI) from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2007 through microbiology records at the two laboratories in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Logistic regression was used to examine temporal changes in antimicrobial resistance and Poisson regression for changes in incidence rates.

RESULTS: The median age of patients with E. coli BSI was 69 years; 306 (66.4%) were female. The age-adjusted incidence rate of E. coli BSI per 100 000 person-years was 48.0 (95% CI: 42.5-53.4) in females and 34.0 (95% CI: 28.6-39.6) in males. The urinary tract was the most common primary source of infection (79.8%). During the study period, resistance rates of E. coli bloodstream isolates increased from 32% to 53% for ampicillin, from 23% to 45% for ampicillin/sulbactam, from 9% to 28% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and from 0% to 12% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance rates to carbapenems, cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam remained low and stable.

CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study on antimicrobial resistance trends of E.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 461 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free