Evidence Hub

Comparing outcomes among outpatients treated for pyelonephritis with oral cephalosporins versus first-line agents

Fosse PE, Brinkman KM, Brink HM, Conner CE, Aden JK, Giancola SE

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2022

15 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are first line agents for acute pyelonephritis. Oral beta-lactams are second line due to reported lower efficacy rates, primarily seen with aminopenicillins rather than cephalosporins. The increase in resistance rates and adverse effects associated with first-line agents provides justification to reconsider oral cephalosporins for pyelonephritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference in urinary tract infection (UTI) recurrence rates between oral cephalosporins and first-line agents in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study from December 1, 2018 to May 31, 2020. The study population was adult TRICARE beneficiaries with a diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis who were treated with oral antibiotics. The two cohorts compared were first-line antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and TMP-SMX) and oral cephalosporins. The primary outcome was UTI recurrence rate at 30 days, which was defined as a repeat clinic visit, emergency department visit, or hospital admission for a UTI (cystitis or pyelonephritis). The secondary outcome was to determine independent risk factors for UTI recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 268 cephalosporin and 211 first-line cases were included. The primary composite outcome of UTI recurrence within 30 days occurred in 44 (16%) cephalosporin and 36 (17%) first-line…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free