Evidence Hub

Antibiogram profile of uropathogens isolated at Bahir Dar Regional Health Research Laboratory Centre, Northwest Ethiopia

Derbie A, Hailu D, Mekonnen D, Abera B, Yitayew G

The Pan African medical journal, 2017

446 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance among bacteria that cause urinary tract infection (UTI) has been increasing since the introduction of chemotherapy. This study was aimed to assess the types of isolates from patients with UTI and to determine their current antimicrobial susceptibility profile.

METHODS: A record based retrospective analysis of bacterial uropathogens processed in the period of January 2012 to December 2014 at Bahir Dar Health Research Laboratory Center (BRHRLC) was determined. According to standard microbiological procedures, midstream urine samples were collected and processed with conventional culture and biochemical tests. Isolates were tested against commonly used antibiotics by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion methods. Chi-square test was calculated to compare the proportion of bacterial isolates between sex and age and statistical significance was set at p value < 0.05.

RESULTS: Out of 446 patients, female constituted at 299 (67%). Significant bacteriuria was reported on 30.5% (95% CI: 26.4-34.9%) cultures. Of these, 78% (95% CI: 71.0-84.7%) were from females. Age and sex were found associated with significant bacteriuria at p=0.046 and p=0.001 respectively. The most commonly identified isolates were Escherichia coli, at 72 (49 %) followed by Klebshella pneumonia at 20 (13.6%) and Pseudomonas aureginosa at 11 (7.5%). The overall antimicrobial susceptibility profile showed that Trimetoprim-sulphamethoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate and ampicillin revealed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 446 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free