Evidence Hub

Profile and prognosis of febrile elderly patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection

Tal S, Guller V, Levi S, Bardenstein R, Berger D, Gurevich I, Gurevich A

The Journal of infection, 2005

191 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of elderly patients with bacteremic urinary tract infections (UTI) and correlate clinical and laboratory findings with the outcome in order to identify independent predictors of mortality.

METHODS: This retrospective study took place in a large community-based, geriatric hospital and included 191 patients aged 75-105 years with urine and blood cultures simultaneously positive for bacterial organisms. Records were analysed for demographic information, clinical and laboratory data over a 29 month period. Mortality was assessed and was correlated with these findings.

RESULTS: Most of the patients (80.1%) had community-acquired infection. Gram-negative organisms accounted for 87.6% of bacterial isolates, with Escherichia coli accounting for 46.1% of cases. Non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative organisms were highly resistant to two common urinary tract antibiotics (gentamicin and ceftriaxone). Patients with chronic urinary catheter had Gram-negative bacteria significantly less sensitive to ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, ampicillin and ceftriaxon than patients without catheter (p<0.05). In-hospital mortality was 33%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality was significantly related to the number of underlying diagnoses (p<0.0203), cognitive status (p<0.0003), length of hospitalization (p<0.0397), low level of serum albumin (p<0.0021), high neutrophil count (p<0.0001) and high level of lactate dehydrogenase (p<0.0351). Fatality was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 191 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free