Evidence Hub

The ability of prior urinary cultures results to predict future culture results in neurogenic bladder patients

Clark R, Welk B

Neurourology and urodynamics, 2018

146 participants

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if previous urinary cultures can predict the organism and susceptibility of subsequent urinary cultures in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

METHODS: We retrospectively identified a sample of neurogenic bladder patients from a tertiary care urology clinic (July 2015-July 2016). We reviewed the patient chart, and then used the electronic laboratory record to identify all urine cultures done in the 2 years prior. We identified sequential culture pairs and determined the concordance of the initial culture organism to the subsequent one and similarly the concordance of the initial culture's antibiotic resistance status to the subsequent culture's one.

RESULTS: We identified 146 people with neurogenic bladder (mostly due to spinal cord injury [n = 61], multiple sclerosis [n = 26], or spina bifida [n = 25]). These individuals used primarily intermittent catheterization (n = 69, 47%) spontaneous voiding (n = 59, 40%), or indwelling foley catheter (n = 31, 21%). During the previous 2-years, 81 participants had at least two positive urine cultures and a total of 479 cultures could be examined for organism/susceptibility concordance. There was 56% concordance of bacterial species between subsequent urine cultures, and this decreased significantly with increasing time between cultures (P = 0.02). Antibiotic susceptibility concordance was high for ciprofloxacin (77%), nitrofurantoin (79%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (75%), with no significant change…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 146 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free