Evidence Hub

Management of urinary tract infections and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates

Amawi HA, U'wais HT, Nusair MB, Al-Okour R, Amawi S, Al-Shatnawi S, Abdi A

International journal of clinical practice, 2021

273 participants

Abstract

AIM OF STUDY: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections affecting individuals of different ages worldwide. Antimicrobial agents are usually the first-line treatment for UTIs, and the use of the prescribed antibiotic is escalating, resulting in increased rates of bacterial resistance and UTI recurrence. The current study aimed to identify the causative bacteria in Jordan, to explore their resistance pattern to antibiotics and to describe drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with UTI management.

METHODS: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted in two major health institutions in two cities in Jordan over a period of six months. The study population included inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with UTIs. Patients' data were collected directly from patients using data collection sheet and from patients' charts.

RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were included, of whom 56.4% were women. Urine cultures were obtained from 81% of the patients. Escherichia coli was the most common causative pathogen (50.6%), followed by Klebsiella pneumonia (10.8%). Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli was the most commonly detected organism across all types of UTIs. Ceftriaxone and imipenem/cilastatin were most commonly administered to hospitalised patients, whilst ciprofloxacin and co-triamzaxole were the most commonly prescribed in outpatient clinics. The susceptibility results for parenteral antibiotics showed high rates of resistance to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 273 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free