Evidence Hub

Factors associated with emergency department revisits for acute bacterial prostatitis

Ferré Losa C, Llopis Roca F, Jacob Rodríguez J, Cabello Zamora I, Martínez Muñoz C, Bardés Robles I

Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias, 2017

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze factors associated with revisits by patients with acute bacterial prostatitis treated in a hospital emergency department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive analysis and prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with acute bacterial prostatitis treated in an emergency department.

RESULTS: We included 241 episodes of acute bacterial prostatitis. The mean (SD) age was 63 (16) years. Seventy-three percent reported dysuria, 64% had fever, and between 15.4% and 22.4% had medical histories of cancer, urethral/bladder catheterization, or prostate adenoma. Positive urine cultures were obtained for 48.1% and positive blood cultures for 17.6%. Escherichia coli was the bacterium isolated most often, and 27.7% of the cultures showed resistance to ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Twenty-nine patients (12%) revisited within 30 days. The only factors associated with revisiting were performance of a rectal examination (odds ratio [OR], 9.23; 95% CI, 1.12-75.82) and bacteremia (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.31-11.04) (P<.05).

CONCLUSION: Factors associated with revisiting for acute bacterial prostatitis were bacteremia and performance of a rectal examination.

OBJETIVO: Analizar los factores asociados a la reconsulta del paciente con prostatitis aguda bacteriana (PAB) atendido en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH).

METODO: Estudio analítico de cohorte observacional con seguimiento prospectivo de las PAB atendidas en el SUH durante un año.

RESULTADOS: Se…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free