Evidence Hub

Prioritizing cefuroxime as empirical treatment in acute bacterial prostatitis: patient characteristics and outcome

Emilie Lecomte, Martin Arys, A. Christiaens, Louise Doyen, J. Marot, Valérie Verbelen, Grégoire Wieërs

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 2026

148 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background Acute bacterial prostatitis (ABP) is a complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) requiring timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Because of growing concern over fluoroquinolone resistance, second-generation cephalosporins such as cefuroxime may offer a viable alternative. Objectives This study evaluates the use of cefuroxime as an empirical first-line intravenous treatment in hospitalized patients with ABP and compares outcomes following various oral antibiotic step-down regimens. Methods We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study at Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, Belgium, including male patients ≥18 years diagnosed with ABP and treated empirically with intravenous cefuroxime between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on their oral antibiotic step-down therapy (cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole or amoxicillin). The primary outcomes were bacterial failure and clinical recurrence within 6 months. Results Of 148 patients screened, 88 met inclusion criteria. No relapses were reported. Escherichia coli was the predominant pathogen (49/88); 100% were cefuroxime-susceptible, while four were fluoroquinolone-resistant. Among non-E. coli isolates, resistance to cefuroxime was significantly higher (OR 8.5, P = 0.003). Conclusions Empirical intravenous cefuroxime followed by oral step-down appears safe and effective for ABP, especially in the absence of known risk factors for resistant pathogens.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 148 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free