Evidence Hub

Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Among the WHO’s AWaRe Classified Antibiotics Used to Treat Urinary Tract Infections in Diabetic Women

Ahmad Hamdan, M. N. AbuHaweeleh, L. Al-Qassem, Amira Kashkoul, Izzaldin Alremawi, Umna Hussain, Sara Khan, Menatalla M S ElBadway et al.

Antibiotics, 2024

116,902 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Diabetes is linked to a higher risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women, often leading to recurrent antibiotic treatments. Frequent antibiotic use for UTIs can contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a critical public health threat that increases treatment failure. This study investigated the prevalence of AMR and its associated factors among women with UTIs, comparing those with and without diabetes. Results: The study population had a mean age of 52 years (SD = 23) for the women without diabetes and 68 years (SD = 14) for those with diabetes. Resistance was highest for cefazolin and levofloxacin in the Access and Watch antibiotic groups, while ciprofloxacin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic. AMR prevalence was 35.7% among the women with diabetes and 21.3% among those without. After adjustment, AMR was significantly associated with both uncomplicated diabetes (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08–1.21) and complicated diabetes (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.45–1.64), as well as with higher numbers of prescribed antibiotics (OR 277.39, 95% CI 253.79–303.17). Methods: Using a cross-sectional cohort from the Physionet database, we analyzed data on 116,902 female participants treated for UTIs, including their antibiotic exposure, diabetes status, comorbidities, and hospital admission details. Antimicrobials were classified per the WHO’s AWaRe criteria. The primary outcome was AMR identified in urine cultures, and the association with diabetes status was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 116,902 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free