Evidence Hub

Impact of antibiotic de-escalation on hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections: A retrospective cohort single center study

Hanan M. Alshareef, Wafa Alfahad, A. Albaadani, Huda Alyazid, Ruba Bin Talib

Journal of Infection and Public Health, 2020

64 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) can be caused by multiple drug-resistant bacteria. Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics help minimize the risk of disease progression. Although antibiotic de-escalation is important to reduce resistance, adverse drug effects, and costs, few studies have evaluated the impact of antibiotic de-escalation on complicated UTIs in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort single center observational study conducted over a period of 1 year at Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), the rate of antibiotic de-escalation following reporting culture and sensitivity results, hospital length of stay (LOS), and factors associated with antibiotic de-escalation failure were determined.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were enrolled in this study. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The rate of successful de-escalation was 29.7% (27 patients) while 70.3% (64 patients) failed to experience de-escalation. The median hospital LOS was significantly lower in successfully de-escalated patients, at 3 days interquartile range (IQR) (2-6), while in the failed group it was 10 days IQR (6-21) (p<0.001). However, the identified factor associated with failure was a multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen that was significantly higher in the failed group than in the successful group: 38 patients (59.4%) versus 6 patients (22.2%; p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic de-escalation is an essential antimicrobial stewardship…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 64 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free