Evidence Hub

Evaluating Empiric Therapy for Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in the Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Natali KM, Nerenberg SF

Journal of emergency nursing, 2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the empiric therapy prescribed for acute uncomplicated cystitis in the outpatient setting (emergency department and ambulatory care clinics) and to characterize uropathogens for discordance between the therapy prescribed and susceptibility.

METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at an inner-city emergency department and multiple clinics to evaluate the empiric therapy prescribed and the uropathogens isolated from culture for patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis.

RESULTS: A total of 144 urine cultures were included. Among the patients, 53.4% were empirically prescribed cephalexin, 20.1% ciprofloxacin, 11% nitrofurantoin, and 8.3% trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The most common uropathogen was Escherichia coli (72.4%), followed by Streptococcus agalactiae (7.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.8%). Of the 107 E. coli isolates, 9 were extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing. E. coli antimicrobial susceptibilities were as follows: ceFAZolin (97%), nitrofurantoin (96%), cefTRIAXone (91%), ciprofloxacin (87%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (59%). The concordance rates with the Infectious Diseases Society of America treatment guidelines for acute uncomplicated cystitis and local resistance patterns were as follows: empiric therapy prescribed (70%), dosing of empiric therapy (77%), and duration of empiric therapy (22%). For empiric therapy prescribed and susceptibility mismatch, 5.6% of the isolates were not susceptible to therapy, 76.4% were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free