Evidence Hub

Susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in urinary tract infections: clinical efficacy of fosfomycin

Kaya A, Akyol-Seyhan D, Chousein-Memetali S, Yaşar M, Mert-Vahabi M, Başkol-Elik D, Dirik Ş, Şanlıdağ-İşbilen G et al.

Journal of infection in developing countries, 2026

179 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) limits effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility patterns of CR-Kp strains isolated from urine cultures to oral treatment options recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, and ceftazidime-avibactam. Additionally, clinical data and outcomes of patients diagnosed with CR-Kp urinary tract infections (UTI) who were treated with fosfomycin sodium-including therapy regimens (FSITR) were analyzed.

METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with urine culture-proven CR-Kp between March 2016 and October 2022. Demographic and clinical data, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment outcomes, and one-month mortality (OMM) were evaluated.

RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included. The susceptibility to fosfomycin tromethamol, nitrofurantoin, and co-trimoxazole (TMP-SMX) were (33.7%; 55/163), (7.7%; 13/167), and (11.1%; 20/179), respectively. All strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin. The susceptibility data compared until 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and afterwards, revealed TMP-SMX susceptibility (4.9% vs 24.1%, p = 0.0001) increased significantly. Susceptibility data for ceftazidime-avibactam were available for 22 isolates and 59% of the isolates were sensitive. OMM of the 179 patients with CR-Kp in urine cultures was 37.4% (67/179). There were 9 FSITR cases. Among those, microbiological eradication was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 179 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free