Evidence Hub

Pediatric community acquired urinary tract infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase versus non-extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing bacteria

Alsubaie MA, Alsuheili AZ, Aljehani MN, Alothman AA, Alzahrani AS, Mohammedfadel HA, Alnajjar AA

Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society, 2023

383 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and antibiotic resistance of pediatric community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing uropathogens.

METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia, among children aged between 0 and 14 years, with a culture-proven diagnosis of community-acquired UTI between February 2019 and September 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not their UTI was caused by ESBL-producing bacteria.

RESULTS: A total of 383 patients with community-acquired UTI were evaluated. Escherichia coli was detected in 72.6% of cultures. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms were responsible for 35.7% of UTI episodes. Of these 69% and 31% were caused by E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to clinical presentation or urine analysis. The resistance rates in the ESBL-producing group were 39.4% for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 65.7% for ciprofloxacin, 72.3% for co-trimoxazole, 32.8% for nitrofurantoin, 21.2% for gentamicin, and 0.7% for amikacin and carbapenems. In the non-ESBL-producing group, it was 22.4% for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 22.4% for ciprofloxacin, 38.2% for co-trimoxazole, 23.6% for nitrofurantoin, 6.1% for gentamicin, and zero for amikacin and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 383 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free