Evidence Hub

High rate of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in Ifakara-Tanzania: implications for empirical antibiotic treatment guidelines and stewardship programs

Magreth Macha, P. Kohler, Anja Bösch, H. Urassa, Weihong Qi, S. N. Seiffert, Sabine Haller, Erin West et al.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2025

1,055 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Sub-Saharan Africa is a significant health threat, with limited data guide treatment. This study investigates multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli in urinary tract infections (UTIs) in rural Tanzania to guide empirical treatment strategies. A cross-sectional prospective study of adults with UTIs was conducted at St. Francis Regional Referral Hospital in Ifakara, Tanzania, from September 2021 to August 2023. Urine culture isolates underwent routine diagnostics in Tanzania and E. coli isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing in Switzerland. Of 1055 patients, 248 (23.5%) had positive urine cultures, with E. coli as predominant pathogen (n = 87; 55.7%). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli (ESBL-E) was identified in 20 (23.0%) isolates, primarily sequence type ST167 carrying CTX-M-27. All ESBL-E cases (20/20, 100.0%) and half of non-ESBL-E cases (29/58, 50.0%) received empiric antibiotics to which the isolates were documented as resistant. ESBL-E showed higher resistance to cotrimoxazole (100.0%) and ciprofloxacin (90.0%) latter recommended for complicated UTIs in Tanzania’s Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG) compared to non-ESBL-E. All ESBL-E isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin, as recommended by STG for uncomplicated UTIs, and fosfomycin showed potential alternative for complicated cases. Nearly one-quarter of E. coli isolates causing UTIs were ESBL-E, predominantly ST167 harboring blaCTX−M−27. Notably, nitrofurantoin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,055 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free