Evidence Hub

Antibiotic resistance: a comparison between inpatient and outpatient uropathogens

Akhavizadegan H, Hosamirudsari H, Pirroti H, Akbarpour S

Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit, 2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common infections and its treatment is complicated by the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Resistance patterns of organisms differ between community-acquired and hospital-associated urinary tract infections.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the most effective antibiotics against uropathogens and if antibiotic resistance differed by setting (inpatient versus outpatient).

METHODS: This 2016-2017 cross-sectional study examined 300 midstream clean-catch urine samples with positive culture (150 outpatient and 150 inpatient samples) for the uropathogens isolated and the resistance of these pathogens to different antibiotics. Samples were obtained from the laboratory of Baharloo hospital, Tehran. The differences in antibiotic resistance between inpatient and outpatient uropathogens were analysed using the chi-squared test.

RESULTS: Escherichia coli (72.0% of the 300 samples) and Klebsiella spp (13.0%) were the most common uropathogens isolated. A greater proportion of inpatient samples showed resistance to ceftriaxone, cefixime, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid than the outpatient samples (P < 0.05). The most effective antibiotics for Gram-negative uropathogens were imipenem (only 6.0% of these uropathogens overall were antibiotic-resistant), amikacin (6.3%) and nitrofurantoin (10.3%).

CONCLUSIONS: Uropathogen resistant rates in inpatients were higher than outpatient rates. The use…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free