Evidence Hub

Catheterized and non-catheterized urinary tract infections among patients attended at Jimma University Teaching Hospital, Southwest, Ethiopia

Teshager L, Asrat D, Gebre-Selassie S, Tamiru S

Ethiopian medical journal, 2008

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prospective cross sectional study was undertaken to assess the bacterial profile and antimicrobial resistance pattern of catheterized urinary tract infection in comparison with non-catheterized UTI in Jimma University Teaching Hospital, Southwest, Ethiopia.

METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, 30 catheterized (age range 20-78 years, male to female ratio 0.36:1) and 90 non-catheterized patients (age range 7-60 years, male to female ratio 2:1) with symptoms and signs of UTI were investigated for significant bacteriuria from January to March 2005.

RESULTS: Significant bacteruria was observed in 13/30 (43.3%) and 20/90 (22.2%) of catheterized and non-catheterized patients, respectively (p<0.05). Klebsiella spp. (33.3%) and E. coli (27.7%) were the most common bacteria pathogens isolated in both groups and followed by Enterobacter spp. (6%). Proteus spp., Pseudomonas spp. and coagulase negative Staphylococci were isolated only from catheterized patients. Gram-negative bacteria isolated in both groups showed a high level of resistance (88-100%) to ampicillin, amoxicillin carbencillin and cephalexin. and intermediate level of resistance (48-68%) to amoxicillin-clauvlanic acid, gentamicin and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole. Low level of resistance (16-24%) observed to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, nalidxic acid and nitrofurantoin. Similar pattern of resistance was observed in all the gram-positive isolates including for methicillin, oxacillin and vancomycin (100%). On…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free