Evidence Hub

Clinical spectrum, antibiotic sensitivity, and clinical outcome of urinary tract infection in the pediatric age group: A cross-sectional study

Mathur G, Singhal Pk, K. R, Dhakad M

Journal of Medical and Scientific Research, 2026

83 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common pediatric bacterial infection; delayed diagnosis and antimicrobial resistance increase complications and treatment challenges. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical profile, bacteriological spectrum, antibiotic sensitivity patterns, and clinical outcomes of urinary tract infections in children.

Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics, J.K. Lone Mother and Child Hospital from October 2024 to January 2026. A total of 83 children aged 6 months to 18 years with culture-confirmed UTI were included. Urine samples were collected under aseptic precautions using clean-catch midstream collection, catheterization, or urine collection bags as appropriate. Samples were processed using semi-quantitative culture techniques on CLED agar. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines.

Results: Among 83 culture-positive cases, females constituted 59% and males 41%. Fever (85.5%) was the most common presenting symptom, followed by abdominal pain (54.2%) and increased frequency of micturition (30.1%). Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the predominant pathogen (66.3%), followed by Klebsiella species (19.3%). Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin showed high sensitivity among oral antibiotics, whereas Fosfomycin and Imipenem demonstrated maximum sensitivity among injectable agents. High resistance was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 83 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free